System architecture, drawn beside the estate
Bought by Platform, SRE and the CTO. Ten questions a day and ten thousand a day are different systems, and which one you are building is a decision rather than a discovery.
What goes wrong here
Ten questions a day and ten thousand are different systems. Throughput, p99 latency, capacity, cost per request and failure behavior are properties you either budget before the build or discover after launch, on the customer.
The estate does not move to accommodate any of this. The new architecture has to arrive beside it.
What we build
- The target architecture drawn beside the legacy one, with the boundary between them named
- Serving and gateway design with a stated capacity ceiling
- Throughput, p99 and cost-per-request budgets agreed before the first commit
- Load tests against real traffic shapes rather than synthetic averages
- Observability that answers what failed, where, and at what cost
What you keep
A migration architecture note: the new system beside the estate, with the budgets on the page.
What ships beside it
An architecture is sized against the data it has to read. These get designed together or they get redesigned later. See data engineering.
Send us the problem
Describe what is stuck. We will come back with an architecture, a timeline and the first commit.